This view also encompasses the question over animal "personhood"—that is, whether or not the rights and protections of personhood afforded humans should extend to all species.On the opposite side are those who believe, as the dominant species, human beings are entitled to make relatively unfettered use of animals for the purposes of achieving survival and advancing civilization.The debate over animal rights is a nuanced one. Since boredom a troubling factor?5. Each has the power to generate debate, stimulate emotional response, and in the worst-case scenario (which is usually Congress), to reduce a room full of reasoning adults into spluttering children. Competing views on the marital rights of LGBTQ+ individuals extend from the ideological division between those who view marriage only as a union between a man and a woman, and those who view marriage as an opportunity that should be afforded to all, regardless of who they love.Supporters of Marriage Equality believe that gender and sexual orientation should not play a part in whether two people are entitled to be married before the eyes of the law. Not everyone is going to agree on a controversial subject.

Individuals who take this view tend to favor policy reform toward more accessible legal pathways to entry, citizenship, and inclusion for immigrant groups.Those on the other side of the immigration reform debate express frustration over the high rate of illegal entry into the United States, especially from the southern border shared between the U.S. and Mexico. It depends on how cool your professor is. Vegetarianism Social issues don’t exist without the society, its cultural, ethical and moral boundaries. Is With so much personal information voluntarily given to tech giants like Google, Facebook and Amazon, privacy advocates would argue that many have willingly traded privacy for convenience.At the center of this debate is the government’s right to surveillance, the rising omniscience of online social media and e-commerce giants, and the limits we place on our own privacy through social media.Security First GroupsPrivacy Rights GroupsIf you want to be an active part of resolving this debate, The debate over free market capitalism generally pits those in favor of economic regulation against those who believe markets are strongest when left to function without regulatory intervention.On one side of the debate, regulatory advocates believe that free markets are inherently unstable, unequal, and prone to the traditional “business cycle” of booms and busts. Places like Ferguson, Missouri and Florida are hotbeds of the problem.